That Girl from Derwent dwells on the value of religion this Christmas.
That Girl from Derwent has learned a few more things about prejudice since moving up North.
That Girl From Derwent reckons if you're going to be offensive, you should find a better reason.
That Girl from Derwent considers why it is that some words have wider implications than others.
My girl friends are the inspiration for many a heated debate; this one is regularly discussed, always argued, and has never resulted in my male friends shouting at me quite so much.
York is a small city, and as such has fewer people but why does that equate to a lesser proportion of hot men? Seriously. It's beyond a joke.
This is not a personal attack but simply one of those topics that has been discussed and discussed, and now, as I ready myself to leave, and having met a variety of girls along my three years, I feel informed enough to discuss it publicly. That and the fact I've finished my degree so can stop wondering about syntax and focus on much more pressing matters.
To test this theory out, last Monday I took a tally of men walking past Vanbrugh C Block (apologies if you know this was you) and counted 81 'No', 13 'Maybe' and 13 'Yes'. On Thursday whilst adventuring in London I think I could have easily reversed those figures.
My darling male companions, once they'd stopped shouting, told me a) I shouldn't write this blog (mainly because they wouldn't talk to me again) and, more importantly, b) the reason that girls like me make sweeping statements like this is because we're nicer about each other.
So a girl's version of 'pretty' is much more generous than a bloke's. Which also suggests they have high standards - which is sort of against every piece of advice that women's magazines have ever distributed. And aren't men always saying women are bitches about each other? But yet we call our kin 'pretty' more often? Hmm, a flaw in the argument there boys!
So is it? Yes, I do realise it's all subjective. But the fact that our house actually text if we find a group of good looking men to alert the others suggests it is a rare experience (the best spot was Sunday Week 0, Term 2, 2nd Year when it appears the whole rugby team were doing their work on the third floor).
On Thursday in The Gallery I found the first female to disagree with this statement. She said she knew several hot men in York (and that she’d Facebook me their names - for which I'm still waiting) but then she did admit that “York does have some grotesque men”. On the flip side, our male friend added “and women!” Three more (female) coursemates then joined us who all agreed – York is some sort of vacuum for good-looking men.
Before you throw comments at me telling me that you either know, go out with, or (quite arrogantly) are a hot man, we discovered another pair of phenomena: there are some hot couples, but a lot of these have blokes from home and thus not from York; and, sprouting from this, there are a massive number of long-distance relationships in York.
Is this just an excuse though - do we blame the lack of opposite sex for our plain lack of it? Do we, as one housemate suggested, just have high standards, or is it that the majority York students are more focused on things like their degree than that opposite sex, which would mean we deserve our oh-so-witty 'Dork University' title.
I do know one thing though: although there are several fabulous men here (who will probably never talk to me again), in an alternative guide to York the opposite sex has to be relatively low score out of ten!
(I also promised I'd put a disclaimer that this doesn't relate to any of my friends or they'll lynch me!)
I hear Ruth has some pretty hot housemates!!
Sam Stoddart is hot
Ruth - I suggest, if you wish to pursue a career in journalism, you get in touch with any one of the number of fools at Heat magazine HQ; I'm certain you're exactly what they're looking for. Congrats.
after living with guys for the last 3 years I've heard some very sexist conversation (or I suppose they call it "banter") - however when I tried to discuss this particular topic with them, it raised some tension. in my opinion you should only talk about appearances etc critically if you're willing to be able to take it.
Shaun, all journalists know that the truly beautiful writing appears in publications like Heat. Think of it in terms of the purity of League Two football compared to the pompous Premier League.
#12...you are now offically my hero!!
I am male and agree with everything you say...in fact i am going to use your labelling system in ziggy's and calculate it with pie charts, graphs, the whole kaboodle
In reply to Nicolas' curiosity - I have met a gorgeous boyfriend here at York uni.
Sorry fellow males but I have to agree with Ruth here... It pains me to say it, but the lack of male talent in York is all too obvious. And it's even more exaggerated at postgraduate level.
Whenever Wentworth has events or we go out as a group, there are always plenty of hot women around, but sadly hardly any cute men. I would class myself as distinctly average on the hotness scale, yet end up with a ridiculous amount of (not unwanted) attention from women, simply because I find myself close to the top of a bad pile!
And having grown up in manchester, been to uni in norwich and lived in oxford & london, York is the worst I know for blokes. Why? Who the hell knows! It does seem to be a feeling across campus amongst females, and most males.
I for one agree with Ruth, and as a distinctly average guy i am pleased. Who wants stunning competition!
I agree with #30, as an below average looking guy I appreciate the lack of male talent in York. It gives me a fighting chance where women learn not to judge on appearances as my father once told me:
"It's not the cover that makes the book but what its like between them"
That's what ugly people say.
Err. In your 'quest' to find your perfect women #12, you find that a lot of women in York are really bad in bed? Sorry, but I'm willing to bet it's a mutual fact. I once was witness to a disturbing York male's (and a pretty promiscuous one at that) re-enactment of his idea of foreplay.* It wasn't particularly inspiring.
I've had my fair share of hotties and I'm no oil painting. Love it. Keep 'em coming.
Has nobody else commented on the fact that if this article was written about the lack of hot girls the only response it would get would be 'chauvinist pig!' and a hammering of other slanders - I think in an age of 'sexual equality' this article is disgusting - feminism did a lot in the way of destroying sexual hierarchy but as far as I'm aware the intention was never to impose a distorted version of it
Surely it is less 'disgusting' to discriminate on the basis of looks than to discriminate on the basis of nothing.
If he lacks sex skills, a sense of humour and all other desiable attributes I would still say that being superficial is better than being a whore.
Also would like to say that I think #12's category Holy Gail would have been an appropriate term for the wealth of 'no sex before marriage which probably means no sex before I graduate' Christian females at York.
#20 i beg to differ
Laura Williams rocks my socks
your looking in allll the wrong places clearly- there are some fucking beauties knockin round!
Hahahahaha..and whose socks are they?!
You must log in to submit a comment.