23rd January
latest news: Anna's sweet and sticky pork buns

Sport Sections

Football
Rugby
Cricket
Other Sports
features/comment

Latest From This Section

City Knights

York City Knights vs Hull FC - Match Preview

Thursday, 19th January 2012

Nick Wright previews this weekend's clash between York City Knights and Hull FC

champions league

The end of an era?

Wednesday, 18th January 2012

Alex Reid looks at whether the once ever-present appearance of English clubs in the later stages of the Champions League is set to become a thing of the past

Warnock

Neil Warnock: The latest managerial martyr

Monday, 16th January 2012

Craig Dobson looks at QPR's decision to sack Neil Warnock and replace him with Mark Hughes

Tansey

York City Knights: Battling Knights secure Rhinos victory

Sunday, 15th January 2012

James Tompkinson reviews an excellent pre-season victory for the York City Knights against Yorkshire rivals Leeds Rhinos

More From This Section

St James' Park
City Knights
Wes Morgan
Cristiano Ronaldo
Old trafford
Jason Walker
Football
Rovers
Snow

2009: tennis's golden year

Andy Murray and his trophy
Friday, 4th December 2009
My experience of tennis Grand Slams has been like waiting for a number 4 bus into York, only a little different. You wait year after year to go to one, and then three come along at once! As Davydenko's win at the London ATP Masters brought the curtain down on a quite fabulous tennis season, what has been your 2009 tennis highlight?

The Australian Open threw up one of the games of the year, as Verdasco hit 80 winners and 192 points only for Rafael Nadal to hold on and to win the marathon semi-final in front of a highly satisfied crowd. With a Melbourne heatwave going on, Nadal rose the intensity for the final, playing his best tennis of the year to reduce Federer to tears.

The French Open saw one of the greatest upsets tennis has ever seen, as Rafael Nadal lost his first game ever, at Roland Garros, to unfavoured Robin Soderling. However, it wasn't plain sailing for Federer either, who at break point, 2 sets to 1 down produced an outrageous forehand that clipped the line to keep him in the game; another inch or two and his year may have all been so different.

Soderling became a fan favorite in Paris on his route to the final, but there it was all about Federer and him finally winning the trophy that had always eluded him. But after failing in the final at the Australian Open, Dinara Safina's wait for any sort of Grand Slam goes on, as fellow patriot Kuznetsova clinched her first French Open title.

And so to SW19. Wimbledon had a new roof which, in its first competitive match saw Andy Murray, the country's only hope, stage a fightback to defeat Stanislas Wawrinka in the best match of the tournament. The people and the press expected another men's champion, the first since 1936, but Murray came unstuck against an on-fire Roddick. The A-Rod went on to rattle the cage of Federer in the final by only losing a single service game, but it was enough to see Federer win a record-breaking 15 Grand Slam titles.

It was at the US Open that we saw the emergence when it mattered of Del Potro, beating an in-form Federer in the final, alongside the incredible story of Clijsters returning from a two-year retirement to beat both Williams sisters on her way to victory.

After reaching all four of the Grand Slam finals this year the key question is whether Federer can continue to keep the hordes of challengers at bay next year? Or can Nadal regain his fitness and come back to contest for the titles? Or will Del Potro maintain his bright form? Or can Djokovic and Davydenko some consistency and contest for the Majors?

Champions have always been judged on their Grand Slam success, so will 2010 be the year for Murray to win his first Major against opponents that make up one of tennis's golden era's?

Check out The Yorker's Twitter account for all the latest news Go to The Yorker's Fan Page on Facebook
#1 Dom Mclean
Sat, 5th Dec 2009 11:20am

I realise 'best match' is subjective, but surely you can't be suggesting the Murray-Wawrinka match was better than the final!?

#2 Oliver Wessely
Sat, 5th Dec 2009 4:54pm

Thank-you for your opinion. I subjectively chose Murray's win over Wawrinka, as it was a landmark match being it the first in the Championships to be played under a roof which let the match slip into the 7 pm prime time viewing, it also had the added significance of involving Murray himself who before and during the tournament was filling up column inches left right and centre, so the fervor from the crowd that was met after Murray won in 5 sets, for me was greater than the final as I think deep down everyone wanted Murray or even Nadal if he was fit, to give Federer his last resistance before he reached the 15 Grand Slams. In terms of tennis played though, I'd agree, the final was better. Just lacked (even as a final) that significance.

#3 Dom Mclean
Sat, 5th Dec 2009 5:22pm

Lol, landmark indeed. Having watched both ON centre court, I can guarentee that the 'fervor from the crowd' was noticeably greater before, during and after the final. While you note that Murray fills column inches; you might be surprised by the extent of support his opposition always receive...his anti-english comments struck a chord with the Wimbledon crowd let me assure you!

Comment Deleted comment deleted by the author
#5 Anonymous
Sat, 5th Dec 2009 5:46pm
  • Sat, 5th Dec 2009 5:47pm - Edited by the author

First Wimbledon match with a roof or the longest final in history in which the world number one had to save four break points in a row and only managed to break Roddick once to win the most grand slams EVER. I wonder which will be better remembered?

Add Comment

You must log in to submit a comment.