23rd January
latest news: Anna's sweet and sticky pork buns

latest news

App Challenge Logo

Photo Diary app wins York prize

Friday, 20th January 2012

A group of York students has won the opportunity to have their very own I-phone application developed after winning The App Challenge final, held at the Ron Cooke Hub on Wednesday, January 18.

computer

Students warned about loans scam

Thursday, 19th January 2012

YUSU Welfare officer Bob Hughes has warned students to be vigilant after a student loans phishing scam has been revealed.

Her Most Gracious Majesty

Queen Comes to York

Wednesday, 18th January 2012

Her Majesty the Queen will be visiting York on Maundy Thursday, 5th April, as part of the 800th anniversary of York’s Charter for the traditional “Royal Maundy” ceremony.

Berrick Saul

Flooding Triggers Network Outage On Eve Of Exams

Saturday, 14th January 2012

A flood caused by a heating system “failure” forced the university IT services to shut down many essential systems on Sunday night, causing problems for many students on the eve of their exams and assignment due-dates.

more news

Red Phone
King's Manor
Aimee and Kevin the Cow
Bomb Disposal Unit
Central Hall & North side of the lake
King's Manor
The Yorker Logo
christmas
Central Hall & North side of the lake

P.O.R.N.O. posters deemed "inappropriate"

Vanbrugh logo
Saturday, 14th March 2009
Posters for P.O.R.N.O., the Vanbrugh event that was held last night, have been deemed "inappropriate" and "offensive" by YUSU.

An email was sent to all the college JCRC chairs in light of the posters put up around campus to promote the event.

In the email, Academic and Welfare Officer Charlie Leyland reminded the JCRC chairs of their "duty of care to all college students", highlighting that over 780 undergraduates have dependants and that York is a "child-friendly" campus.

She continued: "Inappropriate material plastered around colleges is an abuse of your power, tasteless, and incredibly inconsiderate."

In response, Vanbrugh chair Dani Fill admitted: "When designing the poster we didn't think about children on campus because we are at university at the end of the day."

Fill went on the defend the event, saying: "P.O.R.N.O. may seem to suggest you have to dress in barely anything but it is a matter of choice. You can wear barely anything to any event, you are not forced to just because of the theme."

However Fill has apologised for any inconveniences the posters may have caused. Charlie Leyland could not be contacted for any further comments.

Check out The Yorker's Twitter account for all the latest news Go to The Yorker's Fan Page on Facebook
#1 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 9:53am

I think people should be able do decide to print whatever they want.

We are part of a grown up society and to have the possibility of some people censoring us based on some moral authority that the UK government does not even have sounds crazy.

#2 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 1:34pm

"I think people should be able do decide to print whatever they want."

As in publish WHATEVER they want on campus? Like Nazi propaganda? Like hardcore fetish porno? Like homophobic material?

My point is - I am sure you do realise that there are welfare concerns. We do have the responsibility not to offend people. And with children on campus, as well as many people from sensitive cultural backgrounds, printing nudity is not really appropriate.

#3 Jason Rose
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 2:23pm

#1, that's just silly. You can't let people put whatever they want on posters. There are laws against a lot of stuff anyway.

I agree with Charlie - you have to remember that there are children on campus all the time, young teenagers go through the uni on the way to school and that a lot of us don't want to see tasteless posters anyway.

On the other hand, I haven't seen any P.O.R.N.O. posters that I thought were that bad, though I've only seen one.

#4 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 3:45pm

The posters were demeaning. They were demeaning last year but at least they demeaned men and women equally. The sex doll used to advertise the event was pretty disgusting too.

In a university with such a high proportion of international students, there really should have been more thought put into the event.

#5 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 3:50pm

Not all international students come from culturally sensitive backgrounds, but point taken. Let us refrain from generalisations though.

#6 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 6:41pm

if you would promote promote a Nazi event I don't think that you would get too many people showing up. The point is that loads of people that don't view this issue in the same light as you did go, did not have a problem with it, in fact, demand was usually large.

Who are you to say that they were wrong in enjoying the idea?

Comment Deleted comment deleted by the author
#8 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 7:50pm

#1, that all depends who has given the money for the printing and who owns the land on which they are posted. There are other stakeholders here aside from the JCRC in question.

#9 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 8:05pm

I've not seen any of these posters, but generally not many town councils or shop owners would allow a porno poster in the town centre or in a shop window. It's still not appropriate.

As long as the posters aren't obscene, i don't see a problem with advertising this particular event on campus though. The feminist argument is really dumb though. Womens officers are allowed to campaign and that's sexist.

As long as there's no sex or sextoys or nudity or anything else the public could deem obscene, i think postering shouldnt cause much trouble.

Anyone know how the event actually went? Sold out? Money-maker for the college? Good fun?

#10 kate Taylor
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 8:21pm

Amazing night had by all!
X

Comment Deleted comment deleted by the author
#12 Anonymous
Sat, 14th Mar 2009 9:09pm

#9 - are LGBT groups anti-heterosexual? are Racial Equality groups racist?

Add Comment

You must log in to submit a comment.