23rd January
latest news: Anna's sweet and sticky pork buns

Arts Sections

Music
Performing Arts
Film
Art and Literature
Arts Features and Multimedia
TV
Games
Original Work

Latest articles from this section

War Horse

War Horse

Tuesday, 17th January 2012

Stephen Puddicombe looks at Steven Spielberg's latest effort

We Have a Pope

We Have a Pope

Sunday, 15th January 2012

James Absolon explains how this Pope-themed film, despite its risky premise, works

The Artist

The Artist

Saturday, 14th January 2012

Stephen Puddicombe on why The Artist is such a special film.

The Iron Lady

The Iron Lady

Friday, 13th January 2012

Alex Pollard reviews Hollywood's biopic of the controversial Margaret Thatcher

More articles from this section

Sherlock Holmes 2
Girl with dragon tatttoo
Mission Impossible
Black Swan
The King's Speech
The Thing

The Thing

Wed, 21st Dec 11
Romantics Anonymous
hugo

Hugo

Mon, 19th Dec 11
New Years Eve

New Year's Eve

Sun, 18th Dec 11

Bond 23: (00)7 things it needs to do

007 Logo
Saturday, 15th January 2011

James Bond fans breathed a sigh of relief last week when the announcement that had been anticipated for over two years finally came. Bond 23 has a November 2012 release date. Hurray! There’s just one problem. It has to correct all of the mistakes that the crushingly disappointing Quantum of Solace made in 2008, while avoiding the many errors that the series has made in the past (however, that list is significantly reduced if Moonraker is just classed as one big mistake). Here is my list of dos and dont’s that should help the series get back on track.

001. Let Bond have some fun

Despite much speculation to suggest otherwise, Daniel Craig has confirmed that he is returning to the role of Bond. This is excellent news, especially considering his brilliant performance in Casino Royale. However, Quantum required the character to be in a moping state throughout, so Craig couldn’t show the diversity that he had in the previous film. In order to right this, allow Bond to enjoy himself; give him some killer lines like he had in Casino, and for goodness sake at least let him get the girl at the end.

Quantum of Solace

002. No more direct sequels

Quantum provided a worthy experiment in being the series’ first direct sequel, but the result proved that it just didn’t work. While many have complained about the formulaic nature of the films, at least some of the formula needs to be retained, otherwise it isn’t a Bond film. There is a reason, after all, that when the 23rd film is released it will mark the 50th anniversary of the series.

003. Sort out the music

People always talk about the importance of every Bond film’s title song, but each film’s soundtrack is arguably more important. Who could forget the beautiful oriental music from You Only Live Twice? Or the instantly recognisable theme from On Her Majesty’s Secret Service? Quantum’s soundtrack was extremely generic, with all of the style and pizzazz that made the earlier soundtracks so distinguishable sorely absent. The aforementioned style needs to be reintroduced for Bond 23 in order for the music to get back in the groove.

004. Make the villain a villain

The most memorable Bond films are nearly always the ones with the best villains. Who did Quantum have? Can’t remember? No-one can. While the villain wouldn’t need to be as pantomimic as Donald Pleasance’s much-mocked Blofeld, at least give the audience enough to work with to know he/she is truly evil/mad.

Daniel Craig

005. Stay away from the gadgets

Many feel that the loss of gadgets in Craig’s films is disappointing, but with every new ridiculous Roger Moore outing, much of the criticism was focused on the gadgets. Craig’s Bond is a real character, who doesn’t smirk at every killing and use corny punchlines. Yes, Quantum didn’t work, but resorting back to gadgets is not the way. Look what happened when they brought in an invisible car…

006. Get a decent story

Ian Fleming’s books have all been adapted, therefore the scriptwriter(s) need to be doubly good and come up with a story worth watching. Quantum’s plot was almost incoherent due to its desire to be overly serious. However, that isn’t to say we should go back to the camp days of Moonraker and Octopussy. There is a balance that needs to be found, so employ someone good enough to find it.

007. Let us enjoy the action

There are some fantastic action sequences in Bond movies. From the thrilling motorbike chase in Tomorrow Never Dies to the volcano showdown in You Only Live Twice. However, the action in Quantum was far too frantic and unevenly distributed. Again, the balance needs to be found, and action shouldn’t be put in just for the sake of it. We want to be left shaken, not just stirred.

Check out The Yorker's Twitter account for all the latest news Go to The Yorker's Fan Page on Facebook
#1 James Hodgson
Sun, 16th Jan 2011 2:04pm
  • Sun, 16th Jan 2011 10:37pm - Edited by the author

I totally agree with this list, especially number 4. In Quantum, the villain's (can't even remember his name) 'evil' scheme was to sell bottled water to Bolivians at really, really high prices - a plan so crap it would shame even Dr Evil from Austin Powers.

#2 Natalija Sasic
Sun, 16th Jan 2011 4:32pm

I'm still a firm believer that the biggest issue with new Bond is that Craig is totally wrong for the role. I think it's lost a lot of spark because he strikes me as more sleazy and gross than a sexy and charming man of mystery. But unlike you, I kind of long for the days of campy Cold War storylines...

#3 Anonymous
Sun, 16th Jan 2011 10:36pm

I love that there's basically universal agreement now that Quantum didn't work. One of the few films that had me counting down how much longer I had to sit there and endure it.

#4 Robin Ganderton
Mon, 17th Jan 2011 12:09pm

I don't know, maybe I'm a dinosaur here, but I hate Craig as Bond. I feel the same way that I do about Arnie films: if I tune in, I know what I'm expecting. If I want a gritty thriller, I watch a gritty thriller. I don't watch a Bond film. I dislike this homogenisation.

#5 Anonymous
Mon, 17th Jan 2011 3:07pm

The Bond films have generally swung between lighthearted and serious - Connery's started off serious but gradually got sillier, then Lazenby went back to serious, then there was Roger Moore's slapstick, then Timothy Dalton's swing back to grittier action, which Brosnan carried on but gradually they got dafter... and now back to serious with Craig. So in a while I'm sure we'll go back to a more lighthearted approach, but I doubt it'll happen during Craig's tenure.

Add Comment

You must log in to submit a comment.