23rd January
latest news: Anna's sweet and sticky pork buns

latest news

App Challenge Logo

Photo Diary app wins York prize

Friday, 20th January 2012

A group of York students has won the opportunity to have their very own I-phone application developed after winning The App Challenge final, held at the Ron Cooke Hub on Wednesday, January 18.

computer

Students warned about loans scam

Thursday, 19th January 2012

YUSU Welfare officer Bob Hughes has warned students to be vigilant after a student loans phishing scam has been revealed.

Her Most Gracious Majesty

Queen Comes to York

Wednesday, 18th January 2012

Her Majesty the Queen will be visiting York on Maundy Thursday, 5th April, as part of the 800th anniversary of York’s Charter for the traditional “Royal Maundy” ceremony.

Berrick Saul

Flooding Triggers Network Outage On Eve Of Exams

Saturday, 14th January 2012

A flood caused by a heating system “failure” forced the university IT services to shut down many essential systems on Sunday night, causing problems for many students on the eve of their exams and assignment due-dates.

more news

Red Phone
King's Manor
Aimee and Kevin the Cow
Bomb Disposal Unit
Central Hall & North side of the lake
King's Manor
The Yorker Logo
christmas
Central Hall & North side of the lake

Presidential Debate...PEP Style

Presidents
Presidential Candidates
Friday, 29th February 2008
Club of PEP held a Presidential debate earlier tonight where candidates voiced their opinions on a variety of matters. The Yorker brings you the best bits!

Nadz Kunwar kicked off proceedings by making his three minute speech about his policies. He threw down the gauntlet and said: "YUSU isn't all about Sabbs, despite what they think."

He discussed his policy to split the role of Academic and Welfare into two positions: "As we saw with Grace, the pressure of that job is immense."

Quote Why shouldn't students themselves tell us what students want? Quote
Nadz Kunwar

Kunwar is running on a policy of an open YUSU, something he said is "partly because of the media, and partly because, they, we, act as a clique. Students either think you're stupid or you're being arrogant and you don't know what they want."

Next up, Laura Payne said that there are "key facilities that are being neglected because the Students' Union isn't putting them at the top of the agenda".

With reference to her policy calling for an improvement of the bus service, she said: "I think that there should be a subsidy - there's one for staff, why not students?"

Mad Capt Tom, said he was running for "mystery, adventure, and the lure of the seas".

He was asked by an audience member whether his policies, such as having a cannon on Central Hall, would ever pass Health and Safety, to which he replied: "Health and Safety, quite frankly, not be having much say on that, in the unlikely event that I do get elected."

In a rare break from his jovial policies, Tom said: "If I do win, I'll be throwing myself into the role, talking to Brian Cantor and answering the phone as Mad Cap'n Tom."

Quote I be having a genuine opinion on this. Quote
Mad Capt' Tom

Questions were then addressed to candidates from the audience. The first regarded the proposed split of Academic and Welfare into two separate Sabbatical Roles.

Tom said: "I be having a genuine opinion on this. I think we not be havin' the budget to split. I don't think there be enough workload to split it."

Payne brought up the role of an auditor who has been employed by YUSU to monitor the effectiveness of each role, she said: "We shouldn't be employing an expert and pre-empting the decisions."

Kunwar reacted with agreement, although he said: "We've got an expert in how YUSU should represent students, why shouldn't students themselves tell us what students want?"

Tom responded: "Most students not really be caring about what's going on in YUSU. If there's an expert who's doing studies, we should listen."

Another of Kunwar's policies, an online Module and Lecturer feedback forum was questioned. Payne said: "Instead of having another set of bureaucratic things to go through, we should link feedback from departments to the Union."

Kunwar said: "Before they choose a module, students should see if a module is for you, and what you're letting yourself in for."

The proposal gained the support of Tom: "It'd be a grand idea, but I'd be concerned about the workload."

Quote Key facilities that are being neglected because the Students' Union isn't putting them at the top of the agenda. Quote
Laura Payne

When the hot-topic of a central venue was brought to the candidates, Kunwar said: "It's what our Union lacks, and what our Union needs." He added: "As an Ents Rep, I know more than anyone we need a Central Venue."

Tom warned voters that: "It's a probablity, but fairly slim. Don't get your hopes up, we've been here a long time and we haven't seen one yet."

Payne was more optimistic: "I'm very optimistic, if we show we can run a bar, our proposal should be taken seriously."

Ryan Bennett, ex-Vanbrugh Chair asked the potential candidates: "You'll be leading campaigns, as something of a figurehead - what is your actual campaigning experience, give us two examples?"

Tom listed being the British representative of 'Talk like a Pirate Day', something he said raised around £10,000 for Marie Curie. He also told the audience that his charity single, whilst not a great success, showed his ability to campaign for a needy cause.

Payne listed her involvement in the opening of Women's Committee to men, and her involvement in the NUS Referendum, a campaign which she says "doubled quoracy".

Kunwar, last to answer, admitted that whilst "the position I hold isn't about campaigning, it's about getting things done. I'm going to cut out the crap and get stuff done."

Alexios Mantzarlis, Club of PEP Chair, said: "I was very happy with the structure of the debate and with the fact that candidates and their policies were put under far greater scrutiny than that exerted during Hustings."

"I was slightly disappointed at the absence of the returning officers, but I am sure they had good reasons not to be there."

Sam Bayley replied: "We weren't invited in our capacity as Returning Officers, and Club of PEP decided they wanted to be "YUSU-neutral" according to the Facebook group. We had a UGM to set up and run. We'd just had two late nights at the official Hustings/Question time and needed some rest!"

The evening was hosted by Club of PEP. Voting opens Monday, Week 9.

Check out The Yorker's Twitter account for all the latest news Go to The Yorker's Fan Page on Facebook
#1 Anonymous
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 8:30am

Go Nadz!

#2 Anonymous
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 4:28pm

Nadz must win, for the good of the World!

#3 Sam Bayley
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 5:09pm

"I was slightly disappointed at the absence of the returning officers, but I am sure they had good reasons not to be there."

Well, yes we did.

a) We weren't invited in our capacity as Returning Officers, and Club of PEP decided they wanted to be "YUSU-neutral" according to the Facebook group

b) We had a UGM to set up and run

c) We'd just had two late nights at the official Hustings/Question time and needed some rest!

#4
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 5:19pm

Alexios and Club of PEP - I'm sorry for not attending - I'm really busy at the moment. I was also running university challenge selections at 6pm. I did pop by and had a look in. Congrats on a good event. AMC

#5 Anonymous
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 5:32pm

No Not Nadz!
I have no campaigning experience but I will just get things done! What a joke!

Vote Laura or the Pirate, both much more sensible candidates.

#6 Anonymous
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 5:59pm

Vote for policies, not for PAIN.

VOTE NADZ

Comment Deleted comment deleted by a moderator
#8 Alexios Mantzarlis
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 6:54pm
  • Fri, 29th Feb 2008 6:55pm - Edited by the author
  • Fri, 29th Feb 2008 6:57pm - Edited by the author (less)

I'm not a fan of posting on the internet but I'll make 2 comments and then go.

1) Re: my comment on the absence of Returning Officers.- Sam: the Club of PEP's decision to be YUSU-neutral was not decided on the spur of the moment, it was done because we are a non-affiliated society.- AMC: didn't mean anything more than what was quoted on there, but cheers for the apologies anyway.

2) The idiocy of personal anonymous attacks, epitomised by Anonymous #7 above me.
If you don't like what Laura stands for, then attack her policies. Say why you don't think she'd be a good YUSU President. Don't dig up what I presume is either a fabricated statement or a quote out of context to use for personal attacks and on top of this not have the balls to put your name to it.

- Alexios Mantzarlis
#9 Anonymous
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 8:00pm

Alexios, there is a certain hypocrisy in telling someone to avoid personal attacks, in order to subsequently suggest they haven't any "balls."

#10 Alexios Mantzarlis
Fri, 29th Feb 2008 8:18pm
  • Fri, 29th Feb 2008 8:18pm - Edited by the author

Right, last time I post here for I fear the wrath of Anonymous.

Anonymous#9, your point is very cleverly worded.
Unfortunately I don't think I can be making a personal attack when I am up against anonymity. I am saying that I don't respect the policy of shouting loud but not attaching your name to it. Unless you are suggesting that the concept of anonymity is a person, at which point I apologise to him or her..

ps. this argument is now pointless as anonymous #7's point has been deleted.

- Alexios Mantzarlis
#11 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 7:18am

I thought PEP were neutral amongst the candidates? If so, why is their President so actively supporting Payne...? All seems very odd...

#12
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 8:42am

anonymous 11, The president of PEP refused to chair the PEP debate as he is actively supporting Payne. This is why Faye chaired the debate instead. Faye is PEP treasurer and remains neutral in the presidential debate. Hope this clears things up

#13 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 8:53am

Go Nadz

#14 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 9:06am

I used to enjoy reading the Yorker, but its blatent favourtism towards Nads frustrates me a little. The articles are NOT written neutrally, and clearly show a bias towards Nads...and it makes sense, hes is director of the yorker after all! Furthermore, after every article, an annoymous 'go nads' comment appears minutes later.... hmmm, i reckon ill make this a last visit to the website, a shame, but i have just gone off the yorker, as have some of my friends!

#15 Lucy Taylor
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 5:28pm

Seriously now, calm down. Nads is a non-editorial director of the Yorker, which means that he isn't involved in the journalism, technical or admin meetings at all. Thus, most Yorker writers don't even know who he is, or didn't until his campaign started. The Yorker is completely impartial.

Oh, and the Go Nads comments are because someone thinks it's a funny pun, don't you get it? Feel free to post anonymous 'Go Laura' and 'Go Tom' comments to even the balance...

#16 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 5:30pm

Go Laura

#17 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 5:30pm

Go 'Mad Cap'n' Tom

#18 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 6:09pm

There you go, feel better now?

Jeez:

"hmmm, i reckon ill make this a last visit to the website, a shame, but i have just gone off the yorker, as have some of my friends!"

What a proclamation! Nadz's campaign featured a lot of debate re open media which The Yorker will be interested in whether he is involved with them or not. This to me seemed a very unbiased report however. I don't know what you're reading...

#19 Anonymous
Sat, 1st Mar 2008 8:38pm
  • Sat, 1st Mar 2008 8:40pm - Edited by the author

anon 14, i think it a little unfair that every article on the yorker seems to be pulled apart word by word looking for some sort of political bias or incorrectness. Its pretty disturbing that people post under almost every article with their often very incorrect facts and black and white opinions.

Personally, I believe the yorker has done a pretty decent job on reporting all aspects of these elections and its great to see lots of people getting involved. Alot more involved than in previous elections. Partially as the content is nice and bitesized and is easy to digest.

Of course if you are looking for bias you will think you have found it within the articles if you are focusing on it so deeply as people do. Be more open minded.

And this business of nadz being a non-opperational director of the yorker is quite rediculous. I dont think people quite understand what a non-op director is. Its almost like an advisor - an impartial view on the running of a company. They sit on the directors board and as they are not involved with the company can provide impartial advice on direction and decisions.

#20 Anonymous
Tue, 4th Mar 2008 7:38am

"I'm going to cut out the crap and get stuff done."
really? really really?
like you did for BOB?

oh wait, no, you didn't...

Add Comment

You must log in to submit a comment.