23rd January
latest news: Anna's sweet and sticky pork buns

A Week in Lifestyle

Health and Beauty
The Look
mojo
Modern Man
The Know
Getaway
Food & Drink
MSW

Latest Lifestyle Articles

Smartphones

The dating game 2012

Wednesday, 18th January 2012

As we enter a new year, Laura Reynolds looks at how the dating game differs from previous generations.

Christmas stocking

A single Christmas

Wednesday, 21st December 2011

Laura Reynolds looks at the freedoms of festive singledom

Gingerbread House

The Advent Calendar: Day 6

Tuesday, 6th December 2011

Join Jason Rose for a peek behind today's door.

Generic Christmas tree

Going the distance

Wednesday, 30th November 2011

Lauren Tabbron writes about the difficulties of spending Christmas away from a loved one.

More Lifestyle Articles

Do not disturb sign
Ashley Cole
Gossiping
Casino
Date in a field
Sandy and Danny
Long-distance relationship
The Break Up
Long distance relationships

The curse of coupledom

Swan couple
Even the swans are loved up - has coupledom gone too far?
Wednesday, 27th May 2009
I thought it was just the ducks. Terry the Swan and his pen have produced awkward cygnets and the geese are all paired up around their goslings. But coupledom seems to have spread out of duckworld and engulfed an alarming number of students. A random Facebook survey can prove it, everyone is loved up: the freshers frenzy is officially over.

It’s not that I’m jealous; I would pick debauchery over monogamy any day. Nor do I mind seeing couples engaged in PDA (public displays of affection); I do it all the time. It’s that being “taken” is an excuse for being a recluse.

Yes I know, not all couples hole themselves up in their rooms and forget how much Gallery entry costs. But compared to their first-term selves, all my loved up friends party significantly less. What’s their excuse? Well it’s a long one. They say there’s no need to drink to have fun – well that’s just outrageous – more likely the sex is better sober. They say there’s no point going out when you can’t pull – kind of true – more likely they can’t wait for their annoying single mates to get out of the way so they can have sex.

Yes I know this too, being in love isn’t just about sex. But at night it is actually all about sex. You know the drill: exchange the highlights of each other’s day, discuss the following day’s agenda, strip down to couple pyjamas (the invisible kind), have sex, pass out. I suppose what I’m getting at is the finality of relationships. People stop experimenting and start living to the detriment of their fellows.

I have just realised that next year I am living with five people, all of whom have found their significant other. I’m not worried about being lonely, actually I’m very excited about all the young freshers who will be arriving in York – fresh meat. Rather I am prematurely mourning next year’s lack of juicy gossip and crazy nights out in town with the housemates. I may be a pessimist but I assume when offered an hour long queue for Ziggy's or a night of steamy sex that they will all opt for the latter.

I know it’s nice having a boyfriend, especially one that cooks. I just wish freshers would wait a little while longer before settling down. There are so many amazing boys here to have fun with; how can couples realistically claim they have found “the one” after a mere six months at university?

To all those couples who don’t fit the old married couple mould, I salute you. If, however, you are going out half as much, cooking with your boyfriend and doing his laundry, wake up! I personally am still a teenager, my body is probably looking better now than it will ever be. So until I reach my mid-twenties crisis I refuse to do anything mildly adult. Instead, my goal for the week is to have sex in Ollie Lester and co.’s 10 Hidden Secrets at the University of York. Any takers?

Check out The Yorker's Twitter account for all the latest news Go to The Yorker's Fan Page on Facebook
#1 Oliver Lester
Wed, 27th May 2009 12:40pm

Shotgun. I'll even film it and put it on youtube.

#2 Alex Gill
Wed, 27th May 2009 12:58pm

Not sure Buddha would approve..?

#3 Anonymous
Wed, 27th May 2009 6:25pm

Why are so many of the articles on the yorker (particularly online) becoming so depressing? This, along with one by Selena Dhanak on 'Metrosexual Madness' simply resorts to sterotypes. I know this is a space for people to explore journalism and it doesnt have to be crisp academia but couldnt it be refreshing, new and innovative instead of stagnant and reductive?
No - actually i don't know the 'drill' - some people (many, even) can have exciting relationships over brimming with new experiences. I don't even want to challenge these sterotypes due to the risk of just producing new ones but surely some things go unsaid. Why the banality?
Also - the writer of this article is forcing 'these couples into the old married couple mould' that she so dislikes.
I don't want this to be a barrage of criticism - but this just isn't very explorative or vaguely interesting.

#4 Anonymous
Wed, 27th May 2009 6:36pm

#3: well said

#5 Anonymous
Sat, 30th May 2009 3:55am

#3 good point. Why is the Yorker becoming a bit rubbish these days? Half of the articles are about sex, is this a news site or a girls mag? Stagnant is definitely the word.
Mademoiselle is a poor imitation of Vision's campus playboy. Wasn't funny then , isn't funny now.

It could be worse (at least the Yorker has no destructors) but come on guys, get some more news on the site and less 'opinion'! Nouse have been miles ahead on breaking news this term!

Add Comment

You must log in to submit a comment.